‘Violence inevitable at tuition fees protest’
Let us start from the very obvious beginning and it is this: there was going to be considerable street violence yesterday and that was completely inevitable. In more than 20 years of watching domestic and international rioting, I think I have picked up a thing or two about reading these events.
Yesterday was markedly different from previous marches which I have been on concerning student fees. Even outside London University, forming up, there were at least 200 youths at or near the front of the march already masked up.
The police too were much more in-your-face. At this stage still hard baseball caps on the heads, but riot helmets already hooked up to their belts.
Then, the march stopped almost as soon as it began. There were a series of short speeches from student union leaders and an RMT union official. Over half an hour or so these speakers invited protesters to “bring down the government” and ” bring this country to a halt” and there were a number of references to what was felt to be over-aggressive policing.
The crowd, by the end of all this, was absolutely itching to get going and set off at a fast walking pace. That’s significant. There was urgency. Urgency to get to Parliament Square. Everywhere you stood you heard mobile phone and actual conversations setting out the prime need not to get caught in the inevitable police kettling operation. To break out. To keep the police on the run. I heard several conversations even late mrning saying that the thing to do was get up to the West End and hit the appropriate targets – Topshop was mentioned several times on Oxford Street.
I reported much of this by early afternoon. If I knew all this, surely the police did?
Within half a mile of marching we filmed the first police officer being dragged into the gutter, injured by protesters. Already hundreds were peeling off to run up any handy side street and keep the police on the hop – just as they had done on the previous march as soon as it reached the Aldwych area. So by Trafalgar Square sub-marches were pouring into the area from several different directions and the police were shouting at each other and running around to try and slow the march down and get some kind of handle on where people were going and why.
Of course the majority of marchers followed the agreed route up to Parliament Square and here is where everything broke down.
First, nobody had the slightest intention of continuing off the square, up Whitehall, to have a peaceful rally on the Embankment. Student stewards tried to ask people. There was no chance. As openly planned from the off, Parliament was to be the focus and that was that.
How anybody on the police or organisers’ side thought things would be different simply beggars belief. On the day of the vote the target was going to be Parliament, Parliament and Parliament.
So, could the police hold the line? No. As crowds poured in along the northern flank of the square, the plice lines failed. Hundreds broke through police line in the north-western corner where Great George Street meets the square. Within minutes the demo had possession of Parliament Square itself, for the first time since the British people were banned from it some years ago. And they sensed, this was a major achievement.
To get there, a degree of violence was essential, you cannot break through police lines without it. The police responded with batons. Deomstrators then threw any thing they could at the lines of riot police.
But now, instead of having the protest cordoned into one northern flank of the sqaure, the police had lost control of the square itself.
Now protesters could and did attack riot lines all along the eastern edge of the square in front of Parliament itself. They did so at the northeatern junction of the sqaure with Whitehall. And they did so along Broad Sanctuary alongside Westminster Abbey.
Because the police lost control of Parliament Square they now faced concerted violence on not one but at least five flash points. Not only that, for several hours no tight kettling operation was put in place.
This meant that protesters could sense where the kettle would be – Parliament Square – and had ample time and opportunity to escape, regroup and head up to the West End to make good on promises to attack the likes of Topshop.
That they got to the Royal car is currently being reported with general British media hysteria. In fact there is no security issue here except one blatant mistake.
It was obvious that groups of protesters were roaming the West End and had been for some time. All that had to happen was for Charles and Camilla to be told to have a quiet night in and forget the Palladium – unless of course they were keen to see what was afoot and insisted on making the journey. Not entirely impossible, but seemingly discounted in the currrent absurd hysteria surrounding a rather minor moment of violence an a day of rather widespread confrontation.


There are 13 comments on this post
A really observant and balanced piece Alex, would love to know if those responsible for attacking the Royal convoy were in fact students or prospective students, my guess would be neither.
until not so long ago, everybody was a potential (if not a prospective) student. this alone is enough to be angry about. desperate times desparate measures. Charles could show a good (christian) example and forgive those who trespased against him, prehaps even support his most challenged (future) subjects…. prehaps we didn’t understand and this was his way of joining the protests?
“First, nobody had the slightest intention of continuing off the square, up Whitehall, to have a peaceful rally on the Embankment. Student stewards tried to ask people. There was no chance. As openly planned from the off, Parliament was to be the focus and that was that.”
First of all there was no way the march could get to the rally, the police had blocked off the route with a line of police vans and werent letting anyone through, making it impossible.
Second they knew about the protests, had diverted the march and then let Charles and Camilla drive into it. Its either a set up or criminal incompetance.
We are destroying our higher education system, moving from a talent based system to a wealth based system and today all the news reports are about how shocked Camilla looked. To be honest, if you drive through a protest where people feel very very let down by politicians and very very angry, then they are kettled and at the same time, charged by police on horses – when what did Charles and Camilla expect.
Add to that that Charles represents the peak of undeserving privilege, his driving through is bound to anger. Add to that the fact that of all the “royals” he is the most extreme in his regard for the UK being “his” and his lack of respect for democratic rule then – what were they thinking.
The police have a hard job in these circumstances – but I’m surprised they were caught out on this occasion. It appears that these occasions are now regularly used by “anarchists” (or people with a light top dressing of anarchist ideology looking for a confrontation with the “authorities”) in their cause of encouraging confrontation in the hope of gaining a few more converts to their cause. Even if Charles & Camilla wished to venture out – you would think it wouldn’t be beyond the wit of someone to use a less conspicuous car…..If I was a conspiracy theorist, I’d suggest it was hoped something like this would happen…..But I’m not…so I’m sure it was just the familiar accident.
Having lived in France for quite a few years, the protests last night (including the more violent aspects) were pretty restrained. Not that I approve of violence, but our politicians have let down the students and youth in a big big way and are ploughing on without listening. When the politicians are interviewed they only repeat their lies and are not prepared to entertain any other opinions. This is not democracy but ideology.
No cars were burnt-out. Police managed not to shoot anybody. OK, Police behaved badly (kettling and then charging on horseback is really “not-on” but we live in a country where the Police can do what they want without restraint and without accountability.
I think those protesting can see our future Universities full of “Bullingdon types” what can afford 3 or 4 years drinking champagne and trashing places.
Well Alex, your glee at the violence perpetrated by the protesters is evident.
I’m sure the left wing scum that orchestrated this shameful demonstration will be spurred on to bring this government down by fair means or foul by the encouragement given by the TUC and Labour party.
I used to enjoy living in a democracy.
Rediculously small number of comments here.channel 4 working for the state?
Why are you not asking why demo was not allowed to the rally point Victoria embankment? Why not ?did the police not think that letting the protesters through to the union rally would have been better rather than kettling the protesters from 2pm on the east side of the square ….how did the police think that would end up ? Come ask the questions !
I couldn’t care less about Charlie Windsor and his doxy. They will go back to a publicly-subsidised life style without batting an eyelid or uttering a word against the most recent vile ConDem attack on our most vulnerable citizens. So they got scared for a few minutes, so what, who cares?
What they went through was nothing, absolutely NOTHING, compared to the debt and horror visited on our society by the same people who ripped it off in the first place……ex public schoolboys full of sanctimonious garbage and lying propaganda.
The students have a good case and have made it forcefully. This does not suit the lower middle class Daily Mail reading numbskulls who long ago surrendered to mortgage and credit card fear; for them, anything that exposes their sheer funk is to be resented. They long ago surrendered their conscience to the financial institutions. Now the chickens are coming home to roost, just as they did during the immoral Poll Tax legislation (a tax long illegal even in reactionary USA).
Students outrage is valid and impolite. I just hope they don’t play into the hands of agents provocateurs (David Hart, anybody?). But they have shamed lower middle class sheep.
Top day, gave the plod the run around, lost the vote but we’ll still win. This government is mingin and bound to go off by the summer.
Tally ho!
student blogger ‘The Appalling Strangeness’ argues students need to make the case for public money at a time like this, and that they have only harmed their case by protesting:
“If you want the money supplied by the government, then you need to convince the person who ultimately parts with the case – the British taxpayer – that you deserve the money. And a lacklustre protest that occasionally flared into vandalism and violence is not the best way to do that.” Too true. Hardly awe-inspiring.
In the case of the UK, fees are comparatively low; raising them will simply be bringing them to parity with the rest of the industrialised world. Hardly Radical.Just Economics.
The UK government argues fairly that students will eventually go on to earn more money – in some cases, much more money – than people who do not, say £50 – 100,000 on average.
And in the event that they don’t, they won’t have to pay the fees back anyway, how unfair is that?
Is’nt it about time that they stop being pretentious and self absorded, examine the facts and ‘Man Up’ and realise just how fortunate they really are instead of whinging.