Viktor Bout extradited to face US arms charges
Viktor Bout has left the building.
That building being the Bangkwang Prison in Bangkok, where he has spent the two and half years fighting an extradition request from the United States.
Mr Bout (pronounced Boot) was arrested in March 2008 after a US-run sting operation at a hotel in Bangkok. Agents say he offered to sell millions of dollars’ worth of weapons to undercover United States agents posing as rebels from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.
Mr Bout says he was on vacation in Thailand and denies ever selling or trading in weapons. Yet the former soviet air force officer has developed quite a reputation over the years.
Nicknamed the “Merchant of Death“, the 48-year-old is accused of running a vast arms business through a complex web of companies and associates. The charge sheet goes like this: guns, ammunition, tanks and helicopters, delivered to a wide variety of unstable locations, including Afghanistan, Angola, Congo, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Sudan.
Viktor Bout says he is innocent – an honest businessman running a legitimate air-cargo business. He says the business became unprofitable and was shut down in 2001.
He fought a dogged legal battle against his extradition in the Thai courts. The Bangkok criminal court ruled in his favour in August 2009 but the US won on appeal one year later. Ultimately, the only person who could stop the extradition, Thai prime minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva, decided there were ‘no good reasons’ not to. He was handed over to US officials in a slick and carefully planned operation this morning.
Mr Bout’s future may hang on whether he is willing to make a deal with US treasury officials. They think he has got plenty of insider knowledge on global criminal networks. If true and he is willing to spill the beans, he may avoid a life-time jail sentence.
Otherwise, he’ll be swapping one maximum security prison for another.


There are 6 comments on this post
USA get their way again. Sound like a bit of a bad guy tho.
So when is the “Merchant of death” motion picture due to be released?
It’s alread out, it’s called lord of war and stars Nicholas Cage playing a character based on Victor Bout apparently.
The Bout truth is the CIA wanted him no matter what. Who said the cold war was over? C4 was sent a copy of the whole Email that opens up info you will not know about guaranteed. Subject: That which lies beneath the South China Sea was the heading of a letter I sent to G W Bush in his first term as President and other’s like Vice Adm. David Architzel. Come on Mr. CIA work it out? This was sent to Obama.
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:28:10 +0000 Obama, Vietnam would like you to send a fleet to sit of its cost because of China and with Thailand having illegally sent Viktor Bout to stand trial in New York makes that area a dangerous place to send any war ships. Ok I know he is Russian but the red alliance works hand in hand. They would like the US technology used in UAVs and stealth and what has Israel in talks with Russia over UVSs and what are you sending to Israel, stealth plains. Who will get the technology the red alliance and why do they need it. Spin back to the G w Bush years and do recall the smile on his face when he signed the agreement with Putin in 2002? That’s when letters like the South China Sea was sent to Bush and others like Tony Blair and the head of the US Navy…
Can’t wait for the sequel “Merchant of Venice 2: another Bout”.
Hi there,
I don’t think we will ever know ‘the truth’ behind this case. We can debate and discuss facts, opinions and anomalies such as why the DEA were the main (at least overtly) government agency investigating Victor Bout (see this article on the Extradition of Viktor Bout) but it really is going to remain a mystery.
Then we can enter a debate on whether it is ethical for America to use their power to attain a fugitive when arguably the ends (whatever that is exactly) justify the means. If the US is effectively getting hold to interrogate him and the court is indeed kangaroo as most assume is simply wrong or does the weight of his offences mean the world should turn a blind eye? Or should law always be followed absolutely even if it is at odds with some greater good. Philosophical and political questions on these areas are deep to say the least. We might ask about the huge amount of US taxpayer’s money going into his extradition.
At the very least it goes to show the power of the US.