Is Tajikistan the next Afghanistan?
Today a suicide bomber blew himself up in Khujand, northern Tajikistan. One person died and others were wounded. His target: a police station, near the border with Uzbekistan. After reading that, you could be forgiven if you did not read on. But this is a rare occurrence in an extremely important place.
Central Asia. We’re talking about one of the most repressed, impoverished and volatile regions on earth.
Tajikistan itself is the messiest of the five republics. It’s on the border with Afghanistan, where many ethnic Tajiks (although Afghan in nationality) are involved in the fighting.
It has often been a resting place for militants during the last 30 years of war. Last month, in the town of Khujand, ten followed of a banned Islamic group, were jailed for three to 15 years.
It’s not clear what happened here yet, but it is clearer what it means.
If you consider the turmoil hitting Pakistan as the continuation of something that started a while back, then what happened today in Tajikistan may herald the long-term impact of America’s war in Afghanistan.
Central Asia has long been the world’s most unreported mess. Islamic groups – Hizb-ut-Tahir, even the banned Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan – have, many say, had a comparatively easy time in the lawlessness of Tajikistan.
But this attack occurred where they have been oppressed hardest – near the border with Uzbekistan. The Uzbeks have long had a very forthright way of dealing with Islamic groups – well, any group that they disapprove of that is not aligned with the government. Some cases in the past have involved the alleged rape of family members in front of suspects, one notable case involved someone being boiled alive.
As a result the movement has been quietened there – the flourish of popular and Islamic rebellion violently expressed and then suppressed in Andijan, 2005, the last time this became international news.
The extremism or dissent simply went elsewhere in the region – where ethnicities or tribes and not state boundaries are greater signifiers of identity.
Kazakhstan is the regional power – where the economy remains in reasonable, hydrocarbon bolstered shape. But Kyrgyzstan is the obvious sick kid: its south still riven with ethnic hatred after the killing of hundreds earlier this year in a flare-up of violence against ethnic Uzbeks in Osh. The government remains in a near-state of collapse, and outside help is far away.
There are 3 comments on this post
US is building a military training facility for Afghan security forces in Tajikistan near the capitol. We consider it a strategic position. Tajikistan is trying to shut down a large university – for teaching too much Western thinking. US disposed of Guantanamo prisoner(s) in Tajikistan, who later escaped (see escape stories). I think the energy and food crisis and how it is negotiated with Russia is important to your question. The hungrier and less secure a nation the more likely to broil in displays like this.
‘one of the most repressed, impoverished and volatile regions on earth.’ – I think this is a little over done. Most of the regimes in the region are indeed unpleasant and the current vector of development outside Kazakhstan dispiriting, but the Soviet legacy in terms of education and infranstructure and the relative ease of economic migration to Russia make this a very different situation to that in much of Africa and South Asia.
It is pretty much common knowledge that the Andijan massacre had nothing to do with Islamic fundamentalism, rather a group of individuals grew weary of paying bribes to the militia & the protests spread. Also, to quote wikipedia: ‘There is no reliable evidence indicating that the IMU/IMT remains an operational force in Central Asia outside of the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region.”