<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the phone tapping battle over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/</link>
	<description>Just another Channel 4 Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: y.s.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14319</link>
		<dc:creator>y.s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14319</guid>
		<description>Seen the report on C4 News on friday, Fox reporter asked Rupert Murdoch About the phone tapping, Rupert said he didnt want to talk about it, ... next subject.
Well you cant persue him if he is your emplyer??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen the report on C4 News on friday, Fox reporter asked Rupert Murdoch About the phone tapping, Rupert said he didnt want to talk about it, &#8230; next subject.<br />
Well you cant persue him if he is your emplyer??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y.s.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14273</link>
		<dc:creator>y.s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14273</guid>
		<description>News International owns The Sun, N.O.W.  The Times, Sunday Times, ownes part of Sky News and provides news to C5 and lots of radio stations.
They  have FOX network in the U.S. and STAR in India as well as Newspaper and TV busineses in China and Australia.
My question is ... is it a private BIG BROTHER now. Does it control too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News International owns The Sun, N.O.W.  The Times, Sunday Times, ownes part of Sky News and provides news to C5 and lots of radio stations.<br />
They  have FOX network in the U.S. and STAR in India as well as Newspaper and TV busineses in China and Australia.<br />
My question is &#8230; is it a private BIG BROTHER now. Does it control too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>I’m afraid that this is another story that proves MPs live in their own “Bubbleverse” David Cameron seems to be getting acceptance and tolerance mixed up. If he believes that he can pretend that he is holding on to Andy Coulson for an altruistic motive such as loyalty or because he believes in giving people a second chance then he’s as self deluding as Brown. People are not fools and their tolerance for the political class is non-existent.

I was watching a news magazine programme last night. And up to that point had never heard of Rebekah Wade. Perhaps someone could tell me if, when you give evidence to  a parliamentary committee, you are immune to prosecution. Because it says a lot about how woeful parliament and the PCC  are, if newspaper editors feel free to openly admit to bribing the police for information in the past and their intent to do it in the future and the only consequence is an MP pointing out that its illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m afraid that this is another story that proves MPs live in their own “Bubbleverse” David Cameron seems to be getting acceptance and tolerance mixed up. If he believes that he can pretend that he is holding on to Andy Coulson for an altruistic motive such as loyalty or because he believes in giving people a second chance then he’s as self deluding as Brown. People are not fools and their tolerance for the political class is non-existent.</p>
<p>I was watching a news magazine programme last night. And up to that point had never heard of Rebekah Wade. Perhaps someone could tell me if, when you give evidence to  a parliamentary committee, you are immune to prosecution. Because it says a lot about how woeful parliament and the PCC  are, if newspaper editors feel free to openly admit to bribing the police for information in the past and their intent to do it in the future and the only consequence is an MP pointing out that its illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phone hacking scandal rocks&#8230;. U.K. paper accused of invading privacy&#8230;. &#124; Australia News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14235</link>
		<dc:creator>Phone hacking scandal rocks&#8230;. U.K. paper accused of invading privacy&#8230;. &#124; Australia News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14235</guid>
		<description>[...] John Yates said proving phone tapping retrospectRead more at http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Yates said proving phone tapping retrospectRead more at <a href="http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt London</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14223</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14223</guid>
		<description>As far as I can work out, after ploughing through pages of hysteria from Labour supporters who think they can use this story to prove that the tories are almost as bad as they are, what happened is that people working for the NoW managed to snoop on voice mail messages left on the phones of a relatively small number - not thousands, not hundreds - of people who hadn&#039;t had the nous to protect their voice mail by choosing a PIN number.

When I was responsible for IT security in a government office the most effective means I found to make people aware of their responsibility to secure their systems was to do a bit of what the Guradian calls &quot;hacking&quot; and what the BBC calls &quot;tapping&quot; to demonstrate to them how foolish they had been. I hope the rather thick/lazy victims of this business have leaned a valuable lesson.

As far as responsibility goes - Coulson  resigned because of things he should have been aware of - perhaps Gordon Brown should look back at the McBride business and follow his example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can work out, after ploughing through pages of hysteria from Labour supporters who think they can use this story to prove that the tories are almost as bad as they are, what happened is that people working for the NoW managed to snoop on voice mail messages left on the phones of a relatively small number &#8211; not thousands, not hundreds &#8211; of people who hadn&#8217;t had the nous to protect their voice mail by choosing a PIN number.</p>
<p>When I was responsible for IT security in a government office the most effective means I found to make people aware of their responsibility to secure their systems was to do a bit of what the Guradian calls &#8220;hacking&#8221; and what the BBC calls &#8220;tapping&#8221; to demonstrate to them how foolish they had been. I hope the rather thick/lazy victims of this business have leaned a valuable lesson.</p>
<p>As far as responsibility goes &#8211; Coulson  resigned because of things he should have been aware of &#8211; perhaps Gordon Brown should look back at the McBride business and follow his example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/2009/07/09/is-the-phone-tapping-battle-over/comment-page-1/#comment-14220</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/?p=1837#comment-14220</guid>
		<description>No MP would ever have to worry about phone tapping if they abided to being 100% transparent and answerable. 
Like the blanked (redacted) expenses info. they always have much to hide.
Perhaps legalising phone tapping could be a good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No MP would ever have to worry about phone tapping if they abided to being 100% transparent and answerable.<br />
Like the blanked (redacted) expenses info. they always have much to hide.<br />
Perhaps legalising phone tapping could be a good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
