26 Jul 2014

Gaza ceasefire: the limits of the term ‘humanitarian’

For twelve hours they put their lives back together. In Gaza they queued at Western Union for cash, sent by relatives far away. In the shattered suburb of Shejaiyah they dug bodies from the rubble.

At Ben Gurion airport, Tel Aviv, quiet for the Jewish Sabbath and quieter still because of the war, people stood in the taxi rank amid silence as at 8am the humanitarian pause began.

It’s a great word, humanitarian. It signifies there are certain positive beliefs and behaviours associated with being human.

So you allow 50,000 saline drips to be delivered – enough to plug into one thousand arms for maybe a week. You refrain from killing. This is what both sides did today. Those returning to Shejayiah found a moonscape.

The pictures show scenes that, if the suburb had been hit by an earthquake, would have prompted the arrival of rescue teams from across the world. But Shejaiyah was hit by Israel, so “humanitarian” means simply the right to dig with your bare hands for the remains of loved ones, or a lifetime’s memories.

Read more: live from Jerusalem – Israelis extend Gaza ceasefire

While Gaza enjoyed its 12 hours of rationed humanity, the occupied West Bank was gripped with civil disorder: in Bayt Umar and Bayt Rahal south of Bethlehem, the funerals of West Bank Palestinians took place, leading to clashes with the Israeli forces.

Palestinians there say there is not yet, for real, a “third Intifada” – but that the events of the coming week will decide if one breaks out.

telavavphoto

I’m writing this at a peace rally in Tel Aviv. It’s more than just the traditional left and army refuses – there are a lot of ordinary Israeli families here.

But it’s small. 80 per cent of Jewish Israelis polled this week supported the war. And it’s beleaguered – surrounded by army families waving national flags, and by some right wingers, and some football supporters – all of whom who are hurling insults at the peace protesters.

I spoke to Maytal Lochoff, a former member of the Israeli army, and Sulaiman Kmatib, former Palestinian fighter, both members of Combatants for Peace, who helped organise the demo.

Maytal told me, given the violence that has greeted previous attempts to hold anti-war demos, she was worried about the safety of people attending.

26_telaviv_march_w

Sulaiman told me he thought the Palestinian leadership in the West Bank were working hard to hold back the outbreak of a third intifada.

“If Israel can’t negotiate with the moderate Palestinian leadership of Abu Mazen now,” says Maytal, “will it ever negotiate?”

It’s fair to say many Israelis are unaware of the graphic evidence coming out of Gaza, of the deaths of civilians including children.

It’s also fair to say that the papers and TV channels who avoid such imagery are playing to a widespread mood in Israel. Sulaiman fears it’s not so much racism as “extremism”.

The fact remains: the low level of concern about the conduct of the war, let alone opposition, has to shape what diplomacy can achieve.

Israel still believes it can score a strategic victory against Hamas, through military action; Hamas believes it can survive blunt the attack, inflicting a Hezbollah-style reversal on the IDF.

In Gaza, as I write, that three mortars have been fired into Israel. I don’t know if there’ll be a breakdown of the humanitarian truce before the midnight extension.

But maybe, perversely, it’s the fighting that should be labelled with some word starting with “human” – it is certainly a uniquely human thing, available to no other living species, to be able to switch off death, terror and mayhem as a watch clicks over from 59 to zero.