Energy secretary slaps down energy minister
I know that comparisons to the The Thick of It are wearing a bit thin these days but the latest row over comments by Energy Minister John Hayes is beyond DoSac. It might also reveal one of the real tensions in the coalition over energy policy and the green agenda. Hayes is quoted in the Mail and Telegraph attacking onshore windfarms today saying “If you look at what has been built, what has consent and what is in the planning system, much of it will not get through and will be rejected. Even if a minority of what’s in the system is built we are going to reach our 2020 [renewable energy] target… I’m saying enough is enough.”
I understand Mr Hayes, whose scepticism to windfarms meant renewables strategy was taken away from his job when he was appointed in the recent reshuffle, was hauled in by Energy Secretary Ed Davey’s office yesterday and told not to say that. I am told Mr Hayes agreed that his speech at the Renewables UK conference would be amended accordingly. But he had given the original briefing quotes to the newspapers – who promptly quoted things that were not actually said. This has allowed Mr Hayes to claim he stands by what he said on the record – but we don’t know whether he retracts what he briefed to the papers.
So who is right? Well, you can always cut the amount of onshore wind generation, but in order to meet the target of having 15 per cent of our energy consumption from renewables by 2020 we would have to replace it mainly with offshore wind which is about twice as expensive. So his claim that building even “a minority” of windfarms in the planning system would be enough to meet the target is, say Ed Davey’s people, wrong.
The prime minister dodged Ed Miliband’s question in PMQs about whether he supported Ed Davey or John Hayes, sticking (unusually) to the DECC script that government policy has not changed. That sounds a bit like he sided with Ed Davey. But Mr Hayes may in fact have won in the longer term. The suspicion in the renewables sector is that John Hayes is merely saying what George Osborne and others at the top of the Conservative Party think in private. And it has long been thought they were trying to chip away at the renewable energy subsidies as a way of cutting energy bills.
Investment in onshore wind may become harder to find – especially now Conservative councils looking at planning applications have now had the nod from their minister about enough being enough. So Ed Davey may think he has slapped his junior Conservative minister down – but the junior partner Mr Hayes may have the last laugh.
In an ideal world we would have Ed Davey and John Hayes on Channel 4 News to debate their opposing views on wind power. We’d also like to ask what they think of David Cameron’s pledge to force energy companies to put customers on their lowest tariff – also something they are said to disagree about. It doesn’t appear either men are available. The invitation remains open.
Follow @krishgm on Twitter.


There are 5 comments on this post
Krishnan,
This could develop into a brilliant custard pie fight
Meanwhile, the energy spivs get away with increased tariffs and profiteering.
Now whose side do you reckon Brit neocons are on? Ours?
Answers on a postcard……
Who cares what politician said this or what politician said that? They make it up as they go along! None of them have a clue about electricity generation, in particular they don’t have a scooby about wind power. Let us look at the simple facts:-
1) There is no evidence of any co2 savings associated with wind power, any claims by the industry and those others with a vested interest are purely hypothetical.
2) If one includes the Renewable Obligation Subsidy, electricity from on-shore wind costs twice that from normal sources, and from off-shore wind farms 3 times that from conventional generation. Wind farms in the UK are costing the consumer around £1 billion per annum in subsidy, so effectively every time a new wind farm appears the poor and the elderly are driven deeper into fuel poverty.
3) Because of the intermittency of wind power not a single gas, coal or nuclear power station has been (or can be) closed.
4) Claims about the number of houses that wind power is supplying are outrageously dishonest and the public are being completely misled. Wind Farms cannot supply any power to households, all the electricity that is generated is absorbed into the grid.
Here is the real issue:- According to the wind industry figures the UK has about 7.3 Gw of installed wind capacity. Using a load factor of 30% this means that the average output is approximately 2.2 Gw. The equivalent of 2 medium sized power stations. Here is the rub, if all the wind farms in the UK ceased generating we would not notice any changes to our supply, however is 2 power stations went off line we would almost certainly have areas without electricity. The wind farms have a spacial footprint of thousands of square miles as opposed to the 2 power stations being sited in about 100 acres.
To sum it up the government is destroying our heritage, some of our most beautiful scenery, chasing a political pipe dream.
How do people go on arguing over a failed system? The hideous expense of erecting land-based wind-farms, (money which benefits manufacturers all outside UK) the ridiculous idea that with no wind on really cold winter days there can be no electricity generated, and the sheer madness of paying people NOT to produce electricity because there is no storage during windy periods,,,
Words fail! All that expense for so little benefit. Cancel the subscription!!
Well done for having a right go at him the electricity bills are crazy and I’m getting a huge solar farm put right opposite my house in Devon and I haven’t had any letters about this and the mess and sight is unreal.
Your interview with the energy minister tonight on the 7 PM news(13/11)
was an absolute disgrace.When you ask a question try and allow the interviewe to answer before interrupting with another irrelevant question.Also try to remember that,despite your politics.he is a government minister and due some respect,instead of adopting your jumped up self important arrogant attitude.In the current climate regarding
television programming remember your careers are usually rather short.