Osborne’s Swiss tax raid to net 5bn pound windfall, but is it fair?
On the face of it, the Chancellor played a blinder. His team signing an historic deal squeezing what could be up to £5bn for the exchequer from Switzerland’s infamously secretive bankers for unpaid tax from UK nationals. A handy windfall at a time when the coffers are empty. As George Osborne pronounced tonight: “We will be as tough on the richest who evade tax as on those who cheat on benefits.”
Any Briton with untaxed income in a Swiss bank account right now will face a one off charge of between 19 per cent and 34 per cent on their entire balance to account for past tax avoidance. The Swiss banks will prepay CHF 500m of this in 2013. A new withholding tax from 2013 will remove the incentive to use Swiss banks for tax avoidance purposes. That tax will even apply to non doms.
All well and good? Well it depends. £5bn is clearly larger than the big fat zero that the UK exchequer has earned from these deposits in the past decades. But it is clearly far, far less than might be expected if these tax avoiders were hit in the conventional way.
Crucially the enforcement of this charge will be handled by Swiss authorities. Effectively HMRC has outsourced the collection of this unpaid tax to Switzerland. In return Switzerland basically maintains its sovereign historic banking secrecy.
The tax campaigner Richard Murphy is incandescent about this deal. He points out that many of these tax avoiders would have been jailed, and believes the payment including fines and interest would be more like 80 per cent rather than 34 per cent.
The deal does seem to be a pragmatic “amnesty” aimed at getting a chunky windfall, at minimal effort to Britain, at the expense of thoroughly (and expensively) enforcing British law. Undoubtedly however, tax haven aficionados, some who have evaded millions, are getting away with more leniency than your average Brit. Rioters facing jail for stealing £3.50 worth of water might feel aggrieved.
But if that thorough application of the law was applied, would we really yield more than £5bn?
Another critique would be that Germany signed a similar deal which has yielded CHF 2 billion of guaranteed payments, four times as much as Britain. Germany’s deal might not get through parliament.
Mr Murphy believes that the German and UK deals have scuppered the chance of an EU wide agreement with Switzerland that would have unpicked Switzerland’s banking secrecy. A classic dilemma of governing. For a significant amount of cash, would you have let Switzerland and tens of thousands of tax avoiders off the hook?
Follow on Twitter @faisalislam



There are 10 comments on this post
Now why am I not surprised that rich tax evaders gave got away so lightly and are able to continue to operate under Swiss banking secrecy laws? There IS one law for the rich and another for the poor. There always has been and always will be. The point of our political system is to provide a pseudo-democratic fig leaf for this.
The reason that Germany is getting CHF 2 bn upfront and the UK “only” CHF 500 mill is because Germans have 4x the deposits of Brits in Swiss banks.
So this is not a reasonable critique of this deal.
But hasn’t he blown it anyway by giving the bankers a big tax break on money that “passes through” the UK? Can’t remember the details, I just know that one report I read pointed out that this more than makes up for any “public” showing of taxing the bankers.
It’s a cop-out, whichever way you look at it.
So billionaires get away with less than the going rate while new graduates face what is tantamount to an extra tax on any earnings over 25k.
And most of those billionaires will have had a free university education.
George’s idea of what is fair and mine seem slightly at odds
No less fair than Gordon Brown’s auction of airwaves about 12 years ago. That raised £22 billions more than the tax deal. So copying the German’s ground-breaking deal with the Swiss is not so much of a blinder as GB’s was. But very welcome all the same at this time of faltering employment and family incomes.
That GB sale of UK airwaves raised four-and-an-half times more funds than Osborne’s coup. Which paid for more than several ‘roofs that needed mending’ like those of our NHS, railways and school buildings. Moreover, it set a trend around the world for governments to use copy-cat auctions. But none raised anywhere near the UK’s £22 billion windfall. That was unique in the annuls of coups.
The left’s fvaourite accountant Richard Murphy is a complete joke.
Mr Murphy’s hysterical reaction on this topic has been ridiculous. Look at his blog and you would think Switzerland is aiming nukes at the south coast of England.
Far from scuppering the chances of an EU-wide deal, which was highly unlikely at all given that Switzerland could always veto it and the fact that each Swiss canton would need to approve it in a referendum, there was no better deal on offer for the UK in all likelihood.
Murphy’s negotiating style would be doomed to failure. Yes it would be great if Switzerland would hand over all the names of British taxpayers holding accounts in Switzerland but there is absolutely no chance of that happening.
Tax of 30% of something is obviously better than 100% of nothing (which was the case before this deal).
It’s just another sad example of the stratified society in which we live. MP’s allowed to repay fiddled expenses, fat cats allowed to repay a thin slice of avoided and evaded tax. Where are the Prime Ministers demands for prison terms for these criminals? Why do we bend over for it? While the media which we know is in cahoots with the politicians, whip up a frenzy, in a call for the infringement of the civil liberties of the rest of us. Today a sentence of 20 months for a tee shirt. Why so many chat shows asking why the youth are so angry. Well you don’t need to blame rap culture, or poor teaching, or whites acting black. Just as you don’t need a weather man to know which way the wind blows.
Are these people not tax EVADERS rather than tax avoiders, so thereby criminals? It’s despicable that they’re being allowed to have their money paid anonmynously when rioters names, dates of birth and addresses were published for all to see. One rule for the rich, one fot everyone else.
I have been reading through this blog for quite a while but this really is my 1st message. Apologies in advance if it’s way too extensive… I am approaching retirement; and want to ensure that my retirement income will not devalue. I have got enough funds saved up in my Individual retirement account but I do not want to buy anything chancy like securities. I’m no expert on finance and need some investment tips. What sort of investment would you suggest? I have been reading through a whole lot about Swiss annuities lately- & think they appear to be a healthy possibility. Is it a fact that they’re immune to liquidation and divorce proceedings? Furthermore– are the tax breaks they provide Western investors as good as publicized?