Euro-bazooka disarmed, here comes new Euro-bazooka 2.0
I know what it feels like to be the euro. Over the past 48 hours I too have been under siege from Standard & Poor’s. A cascade of downgrade warnings has flowed from S&P’s decision to put pretty much the whole eurozone on credit watch negative.
Curious, unpronouncable entities that I have never even heard of, from the Oesterreichische Entwicklungsbank and the Erdoelbevorratungsverband to the Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, have also been put on negative watch following the euro downgrade warning.
The biggest of these consequential credit actions is of course the European Financial Stability Facility. Standard & Poor’s appears to have killed the eurozone’s existing bailout facility, or at least killed its supposed function as euro-bazooka.
The EFSF was meant to be raising trillions, but the potential downgrading by Standard & Poor’s of the remaining eurozone AAA nations raises severe doubts that it could even make the 440bn euros in firepower that it had suggested.
In many ways this is just catching up with the market position. As I reported after last month’s tepid EFSF auction for Ireland (Rest of the World says ‘nein, danke’ to Euro bailout),there was a sharp decrease in funding from outside Europe: less than a third, versus a majoriy at the previous auction.

So yesterday’s announcement that the EFSF could be downgraded by two notches by S&P was again remarkable timing, but seems to reflect the fact that the EFSF is being quietly forgotten. Chancellor Merkel did not mention the EFSF in her remarks yesterday in Paris.
A senior European source I have spoken to has confirmed that the emphasis is moving towards the early establishment of the European Stability Mechanism. He told me that there had been difficult discussions – “not least because of the change in the economic situation”.
The ESM is the permanent bailout facility. The crucial connection here is between the ESM and the European Central Bank. If the ESM gets a banking licence, it can use its funding to access multiples of that funding with the backing of the ECB’s limitless balance sheet. Then hey presto, Bazooka 2.0.
That is what I think is the hidden message of the carefully planned series of speeches from Mario Draghi and Merkozy. Angela Merkel has done a total about-turn on her views from a year ago on punishing fiscal wrong-doers, and burning bondholders a bit.
There’s tacit admission there that the Lehman’s-style experiment with Greece has, so far, brought much more harmful contagion than good punishment of reckless lenders. It feels like a terrible misjudgement.
The EFSF was always meant, I think, as a psychological stopgap whilst the permanent European Stability Mechanism was being set up. It was also a way to get round the refusal of the European Central Bank to buy Spanish and Italian government bonds in large quantities.
In order to mimic artificially the unlimited firepower of a central bank, the EFSF was itself a product of financial engineering, which was then subject to a further attempt at financial engineering. Everything rested on on-lending the AAA gold-dust of the six fiscally strong eurozone nations. It doesn’t really work if downgrades actually occur.
But then there is the real fun. Mario Draghi’s fiscal compact relies on genuine political change within Europe, more fiscal coordination and coherence, as the price to pay for a more activist ECB. That requires probably some sort of treaty change. If that is signed off by March 2012, then we get tacit thumbs up for the ESM to be levered up to the trillions.
Here are some spanners in the works:
Bundestag vote on ESM: this is the moment Germany will need come off the fence and choose European solidarity over its aversion to debt/inflation. It might not. It could threaten the coalition.
Slovakia/ Finland/ Holland: euro hardcases kick up a fuss.
Greek election: due in January/ February; heading for another hung parliament; 16bn euro tranche of troika funding due in March; large coupon payments to be paid in March too.
Interaction between Greek electioneering and German ESM vote: highly toxic.
Irish referendum on treaty: impossible to see that being passed given austerity misery.


There are 11 comments on this post
The timing from S&P is no coincidence . Just like the wrong announcement that France was downgraded.
It is a deliberate policy from the US institution backed by the administration to kill the Euro and have again the US Dollar as the only reserve currency.
Of course the collapse of the Eurozone would have damaging consequences even for the US but they are convinced it is the a price worth to pay.
And they don’t care if it will sink the UK.
The second problem is that A. Merkel is a stubborn ex communist ( whatever she says ), and her attitude is not based on the fact that her ideas are better , but that her ideas must be chosen.
She is out of the reality believing that she will be remembered as the one who secured the triumph of the German type society ; she will be remembered as the one who killed the Eurozone.
Furthermore I am quite tired to hear about the German financial model , coming from a country who never paid its debts to its victims after both WW.
Maybe the Greek budget would be a bit relieved if Germany would pay the 13 Billions US$ they owe Greece as a compensation for the damages caused during the occupation 1941 – 1945 .
Italy and Bulgari paid theirs .
Wow big news but very worrying for Euro stability
I guarantee you that not a single European electorate will be asked to vote on any of this in a referendum. It won’t happen.
Look at Cameron, he made his political reputation by lambasting Gordon Brown over his referendum back-tracking on the Lisbon Treaty, remember the mileage he got out of it? He even left the option of a retrospective referendum hanging in the air during the election campaign! Of course it was nothing more than political posturing, he must have thought it would be decades before another treaty would need ratifying.
Things have a way of coming back to bite you though.
The terrible truth is, for all his bluster in opposition, Dave is ‘doing a Brown’!
You could go through the archives and edit a special PMQs with opposition Dave arguing for a referendum and PM Dave arguing against.
And if he has to then so will every other country in the Eurozone.
If the markets want stability and certainty they’re not going to get it if any number of countries might say no.
After all, what would happen if the deal was rejected by one or more countries? Would that be the end of it? Would they be asked repeatedly until they agreed? How long would it all take?
So no…
S&P must have known the affect their announcement would have, especially timed as it was in the lead up to this week’s talks. If they didn’t, they are not very good at financial forecasting and so cease to be of importance.
One can only assume, therefore, that it was deliberate.
Faisal, we need to know why. Who is behind S&P, who funds them, who benefits from blowing up the Euro talks like this?
As I was saying in my post which have not been published , it is a deliberate policy from the US government in order to kill the Euro and go back to the supremacy of the US Dollar as reserve currency.
US Debt is more then the debt in the Euro contries. Its just that US doesnt count all its debt together like in Europe. ( Federal, State, Local Government etc.).
So the S&P ratings is meaningless as it does not compare like with like.
All Europe has to do is only count the National Government debts and hay presto problem over.
Will the ECB be forced to drop its unnecessary, entirely cosmetic, and very unwieldy ‘sterilisation’ gimic, and just use it’s normal Deposit Facility like the US/UK do? If so then Germany will have to admit that the SMP is identical to QE for all intents and purposes.
The problem is that I m still waiting to find somebody to prove me that to print money is the solution !
The US and the UK did it but I don’t see any sign of economic recovery.