Welcome to the new FactCheck blog
The battle lines have been drawn for the general election campaign. And the politicians have opened fire with a battery of claims, counter-claims, fishy facts and spurious statistics as they attempt to secure your vote.
Channel 4 FactCheck is here to sort the facts from the spin. First launched in the run-up to the 2005 election, over the past five years the team have scrutinised claims on everything from public spending and the causes of the recession to the number of CCTV cameras in the country.
In the process, we’ve won an award for statistical excellence in journalism, been cited in parliament and received a sack of email correspondence from readers, some very complimentary, some less so.
Today, with the country expected to go to the polls in around three months, FactCheck is reborn as a blog. I’ll be marshalling the fact-checking skills of the entire Channel 4 News team, sniffing out scoops in Westminster and beyond and – I hope – adding my own insight and analysis along the way.
And that’s where Channel 4 News needs you.
You can help keep the FactCheck team – and the politicians - on their toes by suggesting a fact to check out, tipping us off about anything we might have missed, or simply leaving a comment on every article. All will be read by a FactCheck journalist; we hope that nearly all can be published (more on how comments are moderated here).
We hope this new blog site will make it easier for you to find the claims we’ve checked – you can use the search engine on the right-hand side and, as we add articles, you’ll be able to view claims easily by party.
FactCheck will examine claims made by party leaders, ministers, MPs and others in positions of power right across the political spectrum (here’s a selection of some of the most dubious claims we looked at in 2009).
If something smacks of spin, we’ll go back to the source of the claim and test it out against published statistics and official reports, ransack the archives and consult independent experts in the field to try to get to the truth.
We’ll then publish our verdict on this blog, giving claims a rating on our Fact or Fiction meter (to be unveiled shortly) so you can quickly see whether we think something stacks up.
The claims we test may come from speeches, TV debates, media interviews, online articles, manifesto pledges – pretty much anywhere in the public domain.
If you’ve heard it or seen it, let us know, and we’ll get to work.


There are 12 comments on this post
Brilliant and timely.
Factcheck is such an exceptional tool and the search facility makes it easy to use – the blog will add a human dimension for analysis and observation that is most welcome.
Thanks for this – always needed – but never more so that as the election approaches and the spin accelerates to warp speed.
Namaste,
Tina Louise
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hope you live fact check those election debates… I’m syure tehy’ll be full of “facts”.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Yay !! More Cathy Newman than you can shake a stick at !!
You are spoiling us !! Although it is impossible to have too much Cathy Newman. Scoops. Scandal. Interesting Stuff. But a word of warning. AS all good salesmen know..
“You don’t have to lie, there is plenty of truth to stretch”. And not telling the whole truth isn’t lying either.
So dust off some of those lovely English words.
mendacious
disingenuous
misleading
And fire away !!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Hi,
For the 30 years the ‘official figure’ for the ‘unemployment’ count in the UK has undergone a deliberate errosion and fiddle, in order to fool a gullible public. The statistic for those out of work, including those entitled to nothing, is a down right lie. The criteria for people making a claim has been made so deliberately degrading and, the rules governing entitlement and, pressures to get rid of claimants, have distorted the figures by millions.
One area that you may get some statistic but, will probably be fiddled, would be the NI National Insurance Contribution count.
The amount of women now ‘keeping’ their husbands and children, as well as the staggering amount of people being denied help or, deliberately thrown off claimant count via some pathetic excuse, is unbelievable.
Unemployment may not be a sexy thing to investigate but, for those out of work, life is a absolute misery, that’s made far worse by stereo typing ignorant people and, not even being counted on the statistics just because they are entitled to nothing.
This lying government, like the one before it, are the causes of hatred and radicalisations.
Please show some tenacity in invstigating this area and, exposing the truth.
Thank you.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It has happened again tonight with the news item regarding Birmingham. Who was interviewed? The Chief Executive!
The Chief Executive is an employee; he doesn’t make policy decisions. Those are the remit of the councillors, not the employees, so please interview the real representative of the electorate – the Leader of the Council.
It is about time that Chief Execs were told that their job does not entail representing the Council or the electors; only the members of the Council are entitled to do that.
Regards,
Brian Salt.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Yes, I *really* hope you guys live-factcheck the election debates and twitter etc your results, and promote the fact that you’re doing it on the telly. It’d be great if as the politicians speak you could twitter “lying, misleading, dodgy statistics” etc for all to see! It would really help hold them all to account.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Thanks for the comment. We’ll certainly be holding the election debates up to scrutiny as speedily as possible – watch this blog and Twitter (http://www.twitter.com/factcheck) for more details nearer the time…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Does this site have any connection to the US-based site, http://www.factcheck.org , of the same name which has been running since 2003?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
These examples of successful ‘coalition’ parliaments, there are some things though that seem to be common to most; e.g. they did not have to take decisions about the recession/credit crunch and/or about nuclear proliferation and/or iraq/ afghanistan wars (?). It is the like of such major decision that really would test them (!). Otherwise, I am for a ‘hang’ parliament.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Please have a nose into the AA’s dubious claim about mileage vs fuel prices. Mileage dropped substantially straight after the credit crunch, even though fuel prices did too. If I lost my job like many people did, my car mileage would roughly halve regardless of fuel price. Vehicle economy has slowly improved, fuel prices have fluctuated over the past three years, and the AA thinks you can just take two spot checks and assign it entirely to one variable. Utter drivel.
Like or Dislike:
0
0