Is most of the UK's law made in Brussels?
The claim
“Most of our national law is now made in Brussels.”
Lord Pearson, leader of the United Kingdom Indepdence Party, Sky News, 6 April 2010
The background
It is a familiar lament, and one Lord Pearson was keen to repeat. European Union legislation does become UK law by virtue of the European Communities Act 1972, but is Pearson right that most of our laws are now coming out of Brussels?
The analysis
Ironically, the United Kingdom Independence Party’s claim comes from Germany. FactCheck was told by UKIP the claim was based on some comments made by one-time German president Roman Herzog.
In January 2007, Herzog said 84 per cent of Germany’s national laws were made in Brussels. He called it an “inappropriate centralisation of powers away from the member states towards the EU”.
According to UKIP, the 84 per cent figure was based on research by the German Ministry of Justice, which compared the legal acts adopted by the Federal Republic of Germany between 1998 and 2004; with those adopted from the EU in the same period.
UKIP told FactCheck that it took the 84 per cent figure drawn from this research, and adjusted it down to 75 per cent for the UK in light of the fact Britain did not join the single currency.
The party said the downward adjustment of 9 per cent was not based on any empirical research, but an estimate assisted by “senior political experience” within its ranks.
Leaving aside the fact UKIP’s figure was derived from Germany rather than the UK – and the inherent methodological problem that creates – it is worth having a closer look at precisely how the German percentage was worked out.
The German research showed that between 1998 and 2004; 18,187 EU regulations and 750 directives were adopted in Germany. Herzog worked out that during the same time around 3,500 German legislative acts were passed – leading to the claim that 84 per cent of all German laws came out of Brussels, as an obvious proportion.
But as Professor Anthony Arnull, an expert in European law at Birmingham Law School explained to FactCheck, to truly make an assessment you would have to look beyond the numbers, at a more precise level of UK legislative detail.
He said that because of the UK’s remaining jurisdiction over key areas such as health, education and defence – as well as the sheer difficulty in measuring the UK/EU law balance – it meant the 75 per cent claim was unlikely to be true.
Prof Arnull added: “The claim, in a sense, is meant to sound like a negative by UKIP, but often we [the UK] would have implemented these laws anyway, or even initiated them – so that would need to be taken into account too perhaps.
“While if you have a piece of legislation with 200 sections, and one section comes from the EU, does the whole act then get defined as ‘from Brussels’?”
It’s also important to keep in mind that the EU’s powers are mainly regulatory, as opposed to budgetary. So the volume of laws might not always translate into impact and importance either.
Seemingly providing a stat at the other end of the spectrum from UKIP, a research paper undertaken by the independent House of Commons library found just 9 per cent of statutory instruments passed in the UK Parliament between 1998-2005 were implementing European legislation. It is a figure Caroline Flint, former Europe Minister, has been happy to use to reject as “utter rubbish” the jibe that the UK is now ruled from Brussels.
However, the report was candid enough to note that using statutory instruments was not necessarily the best barometer for assessing the EU-UK law balance, stating: “This note does not work out scientifically how this would affect the percentage of EU-based UK laws, but the number of Regulations can be two or three times the number of Directives (or sometimes more). The proportion of EU based laws could therefore be as much as 30-40 per cent or more.”
In fact, this 40 per cent figure is close to a stat quoted by Lord Malloch-Brown in a parliamentary response on the same issue, although he goes in the opposite direction to the Library report, by saying the overall proportion could be “much lower”. Confused? FactCheck thinks you should be.
Lord Malloch Brown told the Commons: “It has been estimated that around half of all UK legislation with an impact on business, charities and the voluntary sector stems from legislation agreed by Ministers in Brussels, but this is a category of legislation which is more likely than legislation in general to have originated in the EU. It is likely that the overall proportion is therefore much lower.”
To add further complications, the same response links to a blog by then Labour MP Richard Corbett, which claimed the affect of EU law in the following countries was at just “6.3 per cent according to the Swedish parliament, 12 per cent according to the Finnish parliament, and between 12 and 19 percent according to the Lithuanian parliament” by way of a comparison.
The verdict
The fact the UKIP figure was based on a six-year old German analysis, which in itself had flaws, is enough to suggest this claim is a step too far.
Clearly this is a complex issue, and difficult to prove, but there is a lack of evidence to suggest 75 per cent, or even half, of the UK’s laws now come from Brussels.



There are 16 comments on this post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z5H2J4hudE
Hans Gert Pottering former EU Parliament president admits it himself.
I think Cathy needs to recheck her “facts”.
What next on FactCheck, conclusive proof that global warming is man-made.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
All I heard from that clip was something about being the “legislator” in “75% of cases”. There was no explicit mention of laws being made in the UK at all. You’ve made huge leap of logic there.
Perhaps your fact checking methods need to extend beyond watching a two minute UKIP video.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Really!!? why don’t you watch this clip of the people in charge of the EU parliament saying that the Lisbon Treaty gives the EU Commission full control over the member states if the treaty goes through, as it did after the 1st Dec last year.
You decide!?. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae1Q8U1Me1M&feature=related
Like or Dislike:
0
1
The govt has been asked many times to give a accurate figure but none has materialised. Thousands of laws have been passed without ever been subject to Parliament since they were issued during recess. We can only conclude that the UKIP figure is a best case !
Like or Dislike:
0
1
to be honest, it doesnt really matter whether it is 75%, 85% or 65% – or any other significant figure. Laws made by the unelected EU are undemocratic and should not be encouraged to any degree. We needd to have democratic law making, not rely on laws that are often unnecessary or counter productive to the needs of the UK. Lets get out of tghis rotten EU superstate and make all laws through parliament again.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
I note the author merely offers her own clearly bias explanation rather than hard fact.
I think you will find that the ONS and the National Audit office confirm the level of EU legislation and regulation, as do Open Europe, and the Tax Payers Alliance who go further stating that this regulation costs Britain £120 billion a year.
But of course we know that the mainstream media cannot possibly be seen not to be supporting the EU.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
It’s a very fair point you have stated just like the amount we give and the little we get back that they tell us how to spend and regardless of the actual amount or laws the question is, is it right that British law is rewritten when we don’t have a say or find out some time much later, I would like my promised referendum who knows it may be yes but not for me I want out and the longer we are denied that the more problems and unrest it makes our future and our children’s future a worrying situation like our steel over a carbon deal, when we get to find out it’s a totally disgrace and a devastation of communities.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Will you publish the comments on this article before everyone has already read it?
P.S. The link in YOUR verdict, is still not working…. I have however found the document,, but am struggling to see the flaws which you refer to?
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Sorry – that link has now been updated. Thanks for pointing it out.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What a lot of dull anti-European comments we have here.
The pragmatic view to it all is to ask ourselves the question, “if we left the EU would the legislation be much different?”, and the answer, if we want to continue to sell our wares, is a resounding no. We’d have to adhere to EU legislation for access to the market, as even China has to. All leaving the EU would mean is that we no longer get a say in it.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Anti-EU not Anti-European, unless you’re implying that we’re already in a federal Europe.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I don’t care if the figure is 5% or 75% the fact is the EU, always eager to find ways of spreading its tentacles, have found a way of bypassing our parliamentary system of government and traditional way of creating, amending and repealing laws.
The EU create regulations and issue acts, bypassing our normal method of government, which bodies such as the departments of health, food, hospitals, police, industry, local government etc. etc. then wrongly and illegally accept as law, therefore allowing the EU regulations to take precedence over UK law.
I’m surprised no one has taken the government and EU to task in a UK court over this abuse of British law and our free will.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
It is incredible that people are relying on UKIP videos and figures from anti-EU groups (sorry, ‘think tanks’!) like OpenEurope or the TaxPayers’ Alliance (representing a tiny proportion of taxpayers).
It is also clear that only a small proportion of ‘laws’ originate in the European Commission (and this based on the orientations set down by EU member states). They are then voted by a Council made up of democratically-elected national governments, and directly-elected MEPs. More regulations follow to implement these laws – always under the guidance of member states and the European Parliament (and many are subject to a veto).
@ Steve Fowler: the 75% / 100% figure is for European Parliament involvement in EU laws, not EU involvement in all laws. It’s very clear if you remove the UKIP standard-issue ear-muffs and goggles. And it’s a good thing for democracy in the EU.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
In the end, this interesting and useful article simply makes clear how difficult it is to reach a definitive figure for the proportion of laws coming from Brussels. It depends, apparently, what is meant by a law. I would disregard the very low figures from Richard Corbett’s blog unless backed up by some kind of reference. That leave the final figure being somewhere between “much lower” than half (Lord Malloch Brown) 30-40% (House of Commons library) and 84% (Roman Herzog, German estimate). OK, so it is tricky to estimate, but the proportion clearly is large and it seems hasty on this basis to rule out the estimate made by UKIP. It may be insufficiently backed up, but it’s not obviously wrong.
Like or Dislike:
0
1
The “EU” reference to laws is used as a red herring.
Europe has:
The European Convention on Human Rights
Council of Europe
European Council
Council of the European Union
European Commission
Lisbon Treaty
and various other bodies all contributing to UK legislation.
From bananas to immigration, trade, patents, pharmaceuticals fishing etc etc etc european law is what matters.
Like or Dislike:
0
0