Horsemeat – the FactCheck update
Last week we cast doubt on the Food Standards Agency’s claim that it had “required” every food retailer and manufacturer in the country to test all their processed beef for signs of horsemeat contamination.
We found that the agency does not have the legal power to order companies to carry out tests and cannot sanction them if they refuse.
And we thought it was doubtful that every seller of processed beef would have time to test their entire range before today – the deadline set by the FSA.
Now the first results from the industry tests are in.
The good news
No new cases of horsemeat contamination have been discovered. The FSA has tested 2,501 individual items and found that 29 of them contained at least 1 per cent horse.
Those 29 packs of meat all came from seven ranges that had already been identified as contaminated and pulled from supermarket shelves.
They are: Tesco Everyday Value frozen burgers and spaghetti bolognaise, Rangeland catering burgers, Findus beef lasagne, packs of four frozen beef burgers from Co-op and two Aldi frozen products: Today’s Special beef lasagne and spaghetti bolognaise.
Products found to contain horse DNA were tested again for the presence of the veterinary drug phenylbutazone, or “bute”, and were given the all-clear.
The bad news
These tests only cover about a quarter of the product ranges covered by the firms that took part in the testing regime.
The FSA says it has been informed of 962 tests that are still in progress. Clearly, if 2,501 tests is 25 per cent then another 962 tests only takes us up to about 35 per cent when all the confirmed tests have finished.
The agency told us that doesn’t mean that we will only ultimately get about one-third coverage at the end of the testing process, it’s just that things are progressing more slowly than hoped.
The expectation is that testing will continue in the coming weeks and more results will be passed on to the watchdog, although it has confirmed that it has no powers to force companies that have so far not come up with results to do so.
These tests don’t cover every supplier and retailer. That much is obvious from the revelations today that two products supplied to pubs supplier by Whitbread contained horsemeat, as did cottage pie delivered to schools in Lancashire.
Neither of these was picked up by the FSA-backed tests, begging the question: how wide is the coverage from these tests?
The FSA lists 110 companies who took part, including all the big supermarkets. But many smaller firms, including the nation’s 6,000 or so independent butchers, haven’t taken part.
Does the FSA have an estimate of how much of the total UK trade in meat is being covered by this campaign? No, was the answer, although the agency is carrying out another parallel random testing regime through local inspectors in 28 council areas as we speak.
What else don’t we know?
Firms taking part in these tests were asked to detect horse DNA at a threshold of 1 per cent or above.
The FSA said that was for practical reasons – commonly available testing kits are usually accurate to that degree – and because the priority is to find significant amounts of horse rather than tiny traces picked up by in the most DNA laboratories.
That makes sense, although it’s worth remembering that the tests by the Irish authorities that first brought this scandal to light were much more sensitive, rightly or wrongly.
Nine out of the 10 cases of contamination initially found by the Food Standards Agency of Ireland would not have been detected by these tests.
And, in keeping with the FSA’s intelligence-led philosophy, we’re only looking for horse in processed beef because that’s where the evidence of contamination points so far.
We’re not testing for other contaminants or checking other kinds of meat.
By Patrick Worrall


There are 12 comments on this post
Pointless exercise then
The companies can go back to normal when this blows over.
- Companies don’t have to do the tests, so one’s likely to be carrying out the practice won’t.
- Of the companies who are taking part it’s only a small range of their appropriate products that are subject to testing.
- Tests are only for horsemeat, not for other contaminents and giving SkyNews exposure of poor & unhygienic procedures among prossessors and suppliers that is very worrying indeed.
- Tests would miss 90% of the positives that the Irish tests rooted out
This is a whitewash!
Hopefully the news networks expose this to he maximum amount of people possible.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The FSA may not have the power to force any companies to carry out the tests but they could publish a list of those that refuse to do so.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
When are they going to start testing for human DNA?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
But it is the source of some excellent jokes & puns. My favourite is that the scandal has now migrated to vegetarian foods with the discovery in meatless sausages of uniquorn.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What is being concentrated on by most of the media, politicians, retailers and producers is the difference between the contents of food packaging and the description of the contents on the packaging.
The really BIG story is being missed – the difference between the contents of food packaging and actual wholesome food. The real scandal is not the fraud of substituting horse ‘meat’, or rather, horse-derived powdered protein for similar, beef-derived, products, but the passing off of such products as suitable for human consumption at all.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I would have hoped the FSA tested for other types of meat contamination. I would doubt that no fraudster has thought to contaminate other meat products with freely available animals e.g. dog or rodents. Or can we assume horse for beef is the only substitute some immoral individual would consider? I think I’ve just found a great reason to become a vegetarian.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
George Gershwin asked in song: “How long has this been going on?” Maybe for years?
My guess is that diluting beef mince with other cheaper sources – horse, pork, chicken, alligator, whale etc – may have been going on for years. Moreover, none of us knows whether small butchers’ shops are all immune from this contamination. Most probably are immune, but maybe not all. Nobody can possibly know.
DNA testing has only been available from recently. Prior to the development of quicker DNA testing it may have been very difficult to detect mixtures of beef-like products. So we can’t answer George Gershwin’s musical question at all.
Some other questions for Fact Checkers:
* Maybe this doesn’t matter that much? After all, unlike the appalling crises in the Middle-East, nobody’s been killed out there!
* Maybe we’ve unknowingly learnt to accept the taste of horse meat blended into our burgers? * Isn’t horse leaner/healthier than beef anyway?
* Have the Belgians suffered from eating horses openly?
Above all, let’s remind ourselves that there’s no evidence that anyone’s been hurt. None.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“There is a long way to go before we can truly say we understand how this came about and therefore what we have to do differently going forward,” said Mr King CEO of Sainsbury’s.
Yeah, right.
Why is no one in the media asking the question why this type of fraud is so endemic?
Why is no one asking why the relentless pressure on suppliers by supermarkets is causing this behaviour? Suppliers are forced to cut corners in order to be able to supply supermarkets. If they don’t lower their prices supermarkets will not buy from them anymore. Supermarkets are the real bullies who need to be reformed. This pressure has now resulted in only 1 or 2 suppliers left standing in some industries. And even these are at risk of being pushed out of the market. Some product ranges can not be sourced abroad, but still the supermarkets insist on lowering prices.
Consumers will have to start choosing quality over price in order to change this behaviour. Supermarkets won’t change, the government can throw even legislation into the mix, but the problem won’t go away.
Here is a task for the media……
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I don’t eat meat myself but I’m wondering why the UK needs to import meat? Why not source it entirely from here? This would make things simpler, surely? The supply chain wold be much shorter for a start. Less money spent on transportation. Everything done according to our regulations and standards. Fewer tests required because there’d be more trust in the process.
No doubt its about cost. Imported processed meat is cheaper. But now we’ve seen what the true cost of cheap meat is? And I wonder at what cost to animal welfare too.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Tesco has said that “We will no longer work with the suppliers who fell below our very high standards.”
What I want to know is what they mean by suppliers? ABP Food Group has said that Tesco were going to continue sourcing beef from them. From that you can take it that Tesco mean the subsidiaries of ABP that supplied them with contaminated meat.
If Tesco are still using any part of ABP it would mean that Tesco are hiding behind the technical use of language in its press releases to continue to work with a tainted company. Is this how they plan to rebuild trust?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The retail pricing of meat in our supermarkets are not due to schools or the public in general, it is purely because of business competition and the aim to achieve more and more profits.
By driving down the cost prices, supermarkets have been bullying the quality British meat suppliers for years – thus, in there ultimate aim to get ‘cheap’, these supermarkets drifted towards European markets and have suffered the consequences as a direct result.
How GREAT it will be to see the return of our local butchers – British ‘quality’ products that encourage confidence and trust to our plates and palate once again.
Like or Dislike:
0
0