Have the Lib Dems kept their promises?
“The Liberal Democrats have been in government for only ten months, but we have already implemented many of our manifesto policies.”
Chris Fox, Chief Executive, Liberal Democrats, March 10, 2011
Cathy Newman checks it out
The police have erected a ring of steel around Nick Clegg as he prepares to address his spring conference in Sheffield this weekend. And now his spinners are doing their best to shore him up, by issuing a dossier of Liberal Democrat triumphs since the general election. They’ve got their work cut out. Protesters furious at a series of Lib Dem U-turns since the party joined the coalition have suggested they’ll try and kidnap the Deputy Prime Minister. So has the list of achievements given him something to shout about? Over to the team.
The Analysis by Patrick Worrall
The Lib Dems have produced a list of more than 100 promises set out in their election manifesto which they say they’ve kept.
That’s an impressive number, but inevitably, some policies are more important than others.
Scrapping ID cards was a big bold move that both the Tories and Lib Dems could agree on – but refunding VAT to mountain rescue teams isn’t something that’s going to make Nick Clegg’s name live on in the annals of Parliamentary history.
FactCheck likes to cut through the waffle and concentrate on the big stuff.
When they published their manifesto in April last year, the Lib Dems set out four key pledges: “Fair taxes that put money back in your pocket. A fair chance for every child. A fair future, creating jobs by making Britain greener. A fair deal for you from politicians.”
Wrapped up in those were a serious of concrete policies: raising the income tax personal allowance to £10,000; investing £2.5 billion in schools to cut class sizes; breaking up the banks and getting them lending again; giving constituents the right to sack MPs; introducing a Freedom Bill; a fairer voting system and an elected House of Lords.
Let’s look at them one by one:
• The Lib Dems wanted the first £10,000 of everyone’s salary to be tax free, meaning 3.6 million more earners wouldn’t pay any income tax.
Instead, they got the personal allowance raised by £1,000 to £7,475, lifting 880,000 people out of tax. It is was a good downpayment, and the party is adamant that the threshold will go up every year until it reaches £10,000 by 2015.
As far as the Chancellor’s concerned though, tax cuts for motorists may have to take precedence. So we’ll have to wait for the Budget in just under a fortnight to find out if there’s a few pennies left over for the Lib Dems.
The Lib Dems also said they’d pay for tax cuts “by closing loopholes that unfairly benefit the wealthy and polluters”.
FactCheck revealed earlier this week that a promise in the coalition agreement to levy a a green air tax had fallen foul of EU law.
Now we can disclose that the Lib Dems have quietly dropped plans for a law to ensure the rich can’t avoid stamp duty by putting their properties into an offshore trust.
In its spin dossier, the party sneakily quotes half of their original manifesto promise.
Here’s how it read in 2010:
“We will tackle tax avoidance and evasion, with new powers for HM Revenue & Customs and a law to ensure properties cannot avoid stamp duty if they are put into an offshore trust.”
This is how it appears this week, as the party trumpets its efforts in launching a £900m crackdown on tax avoidance:
“We will tackle tax avoidance and evasion, with new powers for HM Revenue & Customs.”
Note the small detail left off the end – a promise that might have raised money immediately by closing off an obvious tax loophole, but which hasn’t seen the light of day.
And it’s not the only tax pledge to have fallen by the wayside. Vince Cable’s plan for a “Mansion Tax” of 1 per cent on properties worth over £2 million has also disappeared, although he’d already been forced to water it down after a mutiny by colleagues.
• The Lib Dems vowed to invest £2.5 billion in a “Pupil Premium” fund to help struggling pupils and give schools the resources to cut class sizes.
The scheme has materialised, but in a form that’s created serious doubt about how much good it will do.
First of all, the £2.5 billion will be phased in over five years, although there was no mention of this in the Lib Dem manifesto.
Schools in England will get an extra £430 for every pupil eligible for free school meals. But the money isn’t ring-fenced, the number of children registered for free meals is expected to jump by about 2.5 per cent and most importantly, the cash could be cancelled out by overall cuts to school budgets.
One independent think tank says the Government’s overall schools budget settlement means a 0.75 per cent real-terms cut in funding per pupil, on average, across schools.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies says the most we can say of the Pupil Premium is that “more deprived schools will see smaller cuts, and some will even see an increase in funding, with one in four pupils in schools seeing real-terms increases in 2011…A few very deprived schools will see real-terms increases of 2 per cent or more.”
So much for a £2.5bn cash bonanza for Britain’s underprivileged children, although the Lib Dems insist around 1.4 million are expected to benefit from it next year. We’ll have to wait until schools set their budgets to see whether that turns out to be true.
• The Lib Dems may be on surer ground when it comes to separating the retail and investment divisions of high street banking giants to insulate consumers from risky trading. But success on that front very much depends on the outcome of a report by the Independent Commission on Banking, due next month. It’s expected to recommend some kind of separation, but the issue is causing tensions between the Lib Dems and the Tories. One Senior Lib Dem told FactCheck it would be “high noon” for the Coalition if the party didn’t get a bank break-up. But the Chancellor is cautious about the plans.
And efforts to get banks lending again have had only mixed success. Under the Coalition deal with the banks – dubbed Project Merlin – banks will lend about £190bn to businesses this year, including £76bn to small firms. Lord Oakeshott left the Lib Dem front bench after the deal was agreed, accusing the banks of “taking the Treasury for a ride”.
• Nick Clegg is pushing ahead with a change in the law so constituents can force a by-election if their MP is found guilty of misconduct and is expected to unveil legislation before the summer.
• The Freedom Bill, published last month, reins in council and police powers to use CCTV and surveillance, police stop-and-search powers and the fingerprinting of schoolchildren. The Lib Dems have also scrapped ID cards, biometric passports and the practice of keeping innocent people’s DNA on the national police database.
• A referendum on a switch to an Alternative Vote (AV) system will take place on 5 May this year, something the Lib Dems are presenting as a success.
There’s been a bit of re-writing of history on this too. The new list of achievements conveniently neglects to mention that the party’s manifesto favoured the far more radical Single Transferable Vote system. AV was decided on as a compromise with the Tories – and a “miserable little compromise” at that, according to Clegg himself.
• Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader of the Lords, says Nick Clegg will publish a bill proposing an elected upper chamber “in the next couple of months”. Lib Dems are keen to have a consolation prize in case they get defeated in the voting reform referendum.
Cathy Newman’s verdict
Try as they might, the Lib Dems haven’t got a great deal to crow about. Agreed, they have secured a referendum on voting reform, but current polls suggest they may well lose the vote on May 5. And yes, they ditched ID cards, but only because the Tories wanted to too.
The increase in the personal allowance is undoubtedly an achievement, but like their other “triumphs”, it was tainted by compromise. The pupil premium wasn’t nearly as generous as they would have liked, and as FactCheck reveals today, promises on tax avoidance have been chiselled away.
The reason why effigies of Nick Clegg are being paraded round Sheffield by protesters is that, for all that the Lib Dems have achieved in government, they’ve given away a lot. The U-turns on VAT and tuition fees are what many will remember, rather than giving a helping hand to mountain rescue teams – important as that undoubtedly is.



There are 20 comments on this post
How many promises would they have kept if they were not part of the coalition government?
Err, none.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What is your evidence for this statement?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
In other words, the party has compromised in the context of a Coalition Government. Err, isn’t that what happens in a coalition?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
TFI Cathy Newman: as per usual she’s given us a goodun.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I fear that the average voter may feel a bit less balanced about the LibDem’s pre-election promises. The perception out here is that orange has turned pale blue.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
So all in all the Lib Dems are achieving quite a lot of their manifesto, according to your article. A manifesto is a statement of intentions, by the way, not a document carved in stone. How much can be implemented depends on how much money there is in the kitty. I think it’s time we all faced reality. And I also think the Lib Dems are doing a good job. They are not the government; they are a minority part of the government. Well done to them!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
the Lib demshave not only miserably failed to live up to their pledges they have also stood idly by while the government has proposedand are rushing throughnhs reformswhich will allow doctors to put profit before patient.
Furthermore they have backed an attack not only disabled people attacking their independence with benefit cutsborn of the mythical idea that somehow you can choose to be disabled and would rather stay at home and do nothing for 5-6k a year rather than go out and earn a much healthier income. only the most severly mentally damaged persons would see that as a good lifestyle the nhs reforms were not in the coalition agreementbutlibdem MPS HAVE OBSEQUIOUSLY FOLLOWED THE TORY VOTING PATTERNS AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY THEY ARE NOW NOT AN INDEPENDENT PARTY WHATEVER CLEGG MIGHT SAY
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Perhaps political party manifestos prior to an election should be based on the economic reality of the country’s finances. In the present economic climate how can any government be held to their manifesto promises?If all parties had to present their plans to one accurate economic agenda perhaps the electorate would be able to assess their priorities and choose accordingly.Currently we have constant criticisms of unmet promises.
Perhaps the Liberals, as the third choice of the electorate should be more observant of the Conservative opinion of the majority rather than jostling for Liberal policy in so many areas.Perhaps that is why their popularity is reduced. A coalition should not be a platform for the minority party but rather an opportunity to have some common ground established and reinforced. The majority party should dominate.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Since when have Politicians, of any persuasion, kept promises…?
All we’ve really established, is that the Lib Dems are just like all the others. Once in a position of power, practical circumstances often mean that rash electoral promises have to go out of the window…
But as the Lib Dems have been running my local authority for many years and now have a complete stranglehold on it (until May 5th), I knew that they were just like everybody else even before the 2010 General election.
And I did say so, in various blog comments/postings. I also said they were dangerous because of their enthusiasm for Europe…
The rest of the country, i.e. that community which has little or no experience of the Lib Dems, is catching up at last…!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
You don’t say which local authority you are talking about. If the Lib Dems have been running it for years and now have a stranglehold they have obviously been doing something right by a lot of people.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
When it comes down to it, it’s tuition fees, tuition fees, tuition fees. That party polticial broadcast image of all those broken promises blowing around Westminster will live long in the mind especially as the main one concerned, remember? – tuition fees.
I think alarm clock Britain has woken up to what the real Nick Clegg stands for – him in power, no matter what – and there’s no snooze button to help us forget.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I love the comment above, it seemed SO apt, “a manifesto is a statement of intentions” … isn’t that what the road to hell is paved with?
FWIW, A manifesto presents a party’s POLICIES. We vote on the expectation that when in power that party will take said policies, draft them as bills, debate them, amend them and then pass them (or not) into law.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It seems a bit daft to criticise the Lib Dems for not delivering all of their manifesto commitments when only the most deluded optimist could ever have believed that they would be in a position to do so. Coalition inevitably requires compromise, and as the junior partner the Lib Dems are inevitably going to have to compromise the most. But at least they’re in a position to deliver some of their commitments – the alternative was staying in a position to deliver none of them.
Some people, it seems, would rather do nothing than do something if they can’t do everything. That’s an incredibly negative and self-centred approach to politics. At least it isn’t shared by Nick Clegg and David Cameron.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
But when you do the opposite to one of your key pledges e.g. tuition fees, voters are entitled to doubt your next manifesto.
This government seems to have decided that as neither party could get an overall majority for what they were proposing, they are free to introduce any number of policies they had never put before the electorate in the name of ‘compromise’.
Surely such compromise should make the gvoernment less radical not more?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I agree with Barbara Robertson that election manifestos should be based on economic reality. However there is no law to make the ruling party publish an honest and open audit of accounts so that the other parties can all have the same knowledge as themselves. It’s all kept secret.
The Liberal Democrats are putting money into nursery education for two year olds, as well as continuing nursery education for three and four year olds, by the way. The poeple who most miss out on educational opportunities are the ones who never get a chance at the start of life. And no student is being asked to pay back any loan! The only people who will be paying back student loans will be graduates earning at least £21,000. Why is that so unfair? Neither my husband or I have ever earned that much and yet we’ve been paying tax to support students all our working lives – and we’ve done it willingly. I’m a graduate and I donate a small sum to my old university each year. I’d like all graduates to do the same.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What would people have been complaining about if the numbers were different after the election and the Lib Dems were a junior partner in a coalition led by the Labour Party.?
Their would have been compromises some of which like tuition fees might well have been the same.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Interesting BBC piece today about the true cost of tuition fees which will inflict the equivalent of an extra 9%tax on graduates earning more than £21kpa and for most of them it will be there until they are 50.
It appears that while any move to increase tax on bankers’ millions more will drive them out of the country and be bad for business,so they continue to go relatively untouched. But it is OK to add this not very stealthy stealth tax on graduates earning a tiny percentage of the high rollers.
So whatever ‘no option’ pleas Clegg makes, he has broken one of his key election promises, one of the main reasons many people voted lib dem.
It is a scandalous betrayal but I guess we shouldn’t be surprised because his tory partners who have given him a pretence of power, always prefer to take more tax from the less well off in percentage terms.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I’ve got an idea for a new C4 comedy programme. Re-run the leaders’ debates before the election and let’s watch with hindsight Clegg making promises he won’t keep, and fighting with Cameron over how disastrous it would be if the other got into power.
Gordon might even look like an honest Joe – until, of course, he says ‘I agree with Nick.’
Like or Dislike:
0
0
So, what’s it like living up there in the Shetland Isles, Ray Turner?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Who kidnapped the Lib Dems? Lib Dem policy was always “If there’s a hung parliament, we’ll insist on Proportional Representation as the price of our support”. Finally,the Lib Dems got this and had the country at their feet, but THEY THREW IT AWAY! No government could have been formed without Lib Dem support. There was supposed to be a second election in 2010 under PR. The result would have been very different from the first. The Lib Dems would have got a lot more seats, and so would the Green Party. There is no need to redraw constituency boundaries before bringing in PR either! The result of this betrayal is the continuation of Thatcherite policies such as benefit sanctions and slave labour, as well as the death of the Lib Dem party, which has been slaughtered at every election since the General Election.
Like or Dislike:
0
0