FactCheck: foundations further undermined
You may remember last month the FactCheck team homed in on the housing minister Grant Shapps’ grand designs. You can see their ruminations here.
Now Labour’s accusing him of misleading parliament, and potentially even breaking the ministerial code.
Just to recap, the controversy centres on Mr Shapps’ repeated claims that more of us should be helping to solve the housing crisis by building our own homes.
Around 14,000 new homes were self-built in the UK last year, fewer than in most developed countries. But the housing minister argued many more of us could don our hard hats, claiming that a three to four bedroom house could be thrown up for a mere £150,000.
Leave aside for a minute how on earth people can construct their own des res and hold down a job at the same time. The bigger problem is that Shapps’ calculations omit the cost of buying the land.
That might not be a problem somewhere like Northern Ireland, where the average plot would set you back £50,000, but in London you’d need to spend a massive £430,000 for a standard 1/15th of a hectare.
Shadow housing minister Jack Dromey told me today: “All ministers have an obligation to tell the truth, using statistics in a way that informs debate and does not mislead the public. Time and again, Grant Shapps has failed in his duty to be frank about the facts of the growing housing crisis on his watch.”
And he’s written to the boss of the UK Statistics Authority asking him to weigh in.
Labour’s also accused Mr Shapps of fiddling the figures on rough sleeping and affordable housing. The housing minister was having none of it, though, retorting that the last government’s regeneration schemes “did more to destroy our nation’s homes since the Luftwaffe bombs of WWII”.
We’ll be returning to this shortly.
Cathy Newman


There are 12 comments on this post
What a disgrace! Thanks for keeping us up with this scandal/disaster for our civilised society.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“The housing minister was having none of it, though, retorting that the last government’s regeneration schemes “did more to destroy our nation’s homes since the Luftwaffe bombs of WWII.””
Has he considered a career in Stand Up?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Useless as Mr Schapps is at addressing the housing crisis in this country, isn’t the elephant in the room here the fact that the land costs in the UK are so staggeringly high?
The cost of £150k for a self-build house is actually on the high side of what could be achieved, and the vast difference between the two figures goes to show how dysfunctional the housing sector in this country has become.
The first political Party to introduce a Land Value Tax to help address this issue, which does so much insidious harm across society, will have my vote and I am sure that of many others!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Could be a challenge, but what about a sub £100k 3-bedroom home? Excluding the cost of land, naturally.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The website TheSelfBuildPortal, launched and promoted by Mr Shapps, has a few examples of house building for under £150,000. Unfortunately the examples are all very much beyond there sell by date. The most recent finished project, which took 10 years, being completed in 2009.
Grant is obviously another politician with his finger firmly on the economic pulse of the nation – maybe we could lend him to Spain or Greece to assist them.
Alternatively Mr Shapps would do well to join the likes of Sir Terry Prachet or Mr Ian Rankin, although that said, these writers tend not to write fiction that stretches that far.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Let’s award Shapps Cameron’s Pinocchio nose for Monday…..But then there’s also Gordon brown & George Osborne to consider….
Like or Dislike:
0
0
There is perhaps a way forward for affordable housing and for urban regeneration, if there was more discussion about offsite manufactured homes (“prefabs” but much higher quality) as practiced overseas, and peppercorn ground rents using public land for social good, eg key workers. Unfortunately the apparent current ideology against urban regeneration makes this discussion very difficult to have in the public domain.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“Leave aside for a minute how on earth people can construct their own des res and hold down a job at the same time.”
Well, how (and where) on earth is…… Australia, and it seems to be quite normal for 20 something couples earning average salaries to be ‘buying a block’ and hiring contractors to build, it’s all the rage in my office.
That said, of course, there is a phenomenal availability of cheap land cf. UK…..low population….no recession (yet)….. (ex Londoner, emigrated to Melbourne)
Like or Dislike:
0
0
As factcheck often shows, if every politician who ‘fiddled’ statistics to his/her own end had to resign, we would be in a constant state of bi-elections.
I think all speeches should have to be sent to factcheck team before politician makes them. (You would probably need a much bigger team!)
Like or Dislike:
0
0
It’s local planning objectors who force up the value of building land by rationing the supply.
It’s not local Councillors’ fault. Planning law provides local home-owners with powerful incentives to pressurise Councillors to block planning applications. Because artificial shortages of house building consents pushes up the value of existing homes. And local gluts of new housing put a brake on the appreciation in value of existing homes.
Major reform of planning law is the only way to reduce those cartel activities by local residents to an acceptable level.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I think this article is no more than shameless political plugging to C4 Factcheck’s own ends – your comparison in the last article didn’t stack up (yes, of course the average dwelling will be cheaper than the average self build if you include flats, terraced and semi-detached homes in your average when clearly pretty much all self builds are detached!), and the above article really doesn’t tell us anything new about the facts. As Juliet says, the custom build model is popular all over the world and it can work as a realistic option for people on average incomes who work full time, and bottom line is that affordable self build schemes where the £150k figure will absolutely be a reality are what the government are actually trying to promote here. The focus of the media on this petty disagreement ignores that, and articles like this will literally deterr people from what is a really sound initiative by damaging consumer confidence. The influence of the media is overly strong and a site that promotes itself as a fact checker allowing its own arguments to be distorted by the political leaning of its editors leaves no hope for anyone to discern the realities.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Who is going to challenge Grant Shapps on the figures below?
Press Release from Homes & Communities Agency, 12th June 2012
Starts on site
A total of 19,967 homes started on site in 2011-12, a decrease of 65% compared to the 57,648 (revised) homes started in 2010-11.
15,698 homes were started for affordable housing, a decrease of 33,665 or 68% from 2010-11.
This reflects the closure of the National Affordable Housing Programme, the Local Authority New Build Programme and the Kickstart Housing Delivery Programme to new commitments in March 2011 and the move to the new 2011-15 Affordable Homes Programme in 2011-12
Like or Dislike:
0
0