FactCheck: Is Britain Nato’s top gun in Libya?
The claim
“…the United Kingdom and France with, at times, the indispensible support of the United States, and then the support of many other allies, acted decisively in March to rescue this situation (in Libya)”
Foreign Secretary William Hague, 1 September 2011
The background
Britain “won’t be left behind” in the grab for Libyan oil contracts, William Hague said today, as world leaders flocked to Paris to plot out the new Libya.
And why should we? Rumours are rife that Libya’s new government plans to hand the French the keys to 35 per cent of the country’s oil. And we’ve done just as much to help Libya as the French, haven’t we?
Certainly, we’re ahead of the Chinese and the Russians – who both opposed Nato’s air strike, but who both turned up in Paris today. The latter of which had only recognised Libya’s new government this morning.
But how do Britain’s efforts stack up against other Nato countries? FactCheck investigates.
The analysis
Nato aircraft have clocked up a total of 21,090 sorties (missions) in Libya since March 31.
The majority of these were “non-strike” sorties, for example enforcing the no-fly zone or helping with reconnaissance.
And of these, the US was easily the biggest contributor – latest Pentagon figures show American sorties accounted for a quarter of the total.
But the Americans flew far less strike sorties. These are missions that engage an enemy target (though they don’t necessarily involve dropping bombs or firing missiles).
Just eight of Nato’s 28 members were prepared to attack, and these eight totted up 7,920 strike sorties (though one – Norway – withdrew last month).
Nato doesn’t give a breakdown of which countries did what, so the best we have to go on are the figures quoted by the NATO-affiliated foreign policy think-tank Atlantic Council.
Here’s the Council’s list of the most recent number of strike sorties to the number of total strike sorties:
France: 33 per cent
US: 16 per cent
Denmark: 11 per cent
Britain: 10 per cent
Canada: 10 per cent
Italy: 10 per cent
Norway: 10 per cent
Belgium: unknown
Britain’s figure of 10 per cent puts its number of strike sorties at a third of France’s and on a par with every other European country.
As Nato’s largest contributor overall, the US attacks show President Obama’s attempts to keep American forces in the background worked to some extent – and is perhaps what Mr Hague meant when he said that “at times” US support was indispensible.
Yet the Pentagon figures show 101 drone strikes – and as the director-general of RUSI, Professor Michael Clarke, points out: “Very few allied attack missions were flown without a US electronic warfare aircraft above them acting as a guardian angel”.
“The European allies were hardly ‘going it alone’ in this operation”, he added. Plus, other European members were extremely reluctant to engage. Turkish and Spanish aircraft were banned from attack missions, Poland didn’t deploy any forces and Germany refused to get involved.
While the UK’s contribution is unconfirmed by the Ministry of Defence, the Atlantic Council sources a Guardian article, which gleaned the stats – 700 UK strike sorties by August 15 – from a British defence official. The MoD would only give FactCheck the general Nato numbers mentioned above.
We also know that the French provided the only aircraft carrier, and Europe’s biggest warship, the Charles de Gaulle (pictured). And the French deployed around twelve attack helicopters to the UK’s five.
The verdict
French President Nicolas Sarkozy stuck his neck out on Libya; providing double the strike support of the Americans and three times as much as the British.
While Mr Hague was reluctant to share the limelight beyond the entente cordiale to other European countries, let alone beyond, Sarkozy praised the Nato alliance as “an indispensable tool”.
“For the first time since 1949 NATO was put at the service of a coalition led by two determined European countries, France and Great Britain,” Mr. Sarkozy said yesterday. Libya, he said, had proved “a strong contrast” to past European weakness.
Monsieur, you’re really spoiling us.
The UK has been credited as France’s wingman in Libya, but the Atlantic Council’s figures suggest our contribution is on a par with Italy, Canada, Denmark and Norway, which pulled out a month ago.
*Update 2nd September: In an interview with Radio 4 David Cameron claimed the UK conducted 20 per cent of all Nato strike sorties in Libya. He said: “Britain performed 1,600 of those, so around a fifth of strike sorties and I think that is punching, as it were, at our weight or even above our weight.” The MoD confirmed the numbers to FactCheck and revealed that the UK has conducted 12 per cent of all sorties overall.
By Emma Thelwell
Follow @FactCheck on Twitter



There are 10 comments on this post
There is no doubt that France was is the lead, but given the fact that we have had deployed between three and four times the number of aircraft that Denmark, Norway and Canada have put forward, the 10% of sortie figure for the UK looks very iffy.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
We’ve also fired a number (I don’t know how many) of Tomahawk cruise missiles from a sub, don’t forget.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
To Alastair and Rowan would you still make the same Comments if your Family was on the Ground in Libya.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Cathy/Emma,
Suggestion: check out pre-war Brit energy companies share of the rip off. Then, when all this is over (say in six-nine months) check the new figures against the old.
Guess what you’ll find……….
Might be an idea too to check out individuals in the new government, what their links to Western governments are/were, and what individual financial interests they have in Libyan oil.
Additionally, if possible (highly unlikely) identify the ACTUAL sorties targets not the NATO claimed targets. Then compare the ACTUAL targets to the UN Resolution. You’ll probably find a high level of illegality in the attacks.
Not that any of it will bother MilliCamClegg one bit. But it will help to keep the record straight.
Congratulations on yet another bang-up job.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Well said Philip!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Who cares whether or not Britain was Nato’s Top Gun in Libya? I do not, and I find the whole issue morally repugnant. Are we really owed contracts and oil for our part in the hostilities? At a time when many thousands have been killed and injured this discussion of the fruits of ‘disaster capitalism’ should have been left until later. It is in extremely bad taste!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Well said Teresa.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
There is no excuse now, when the Trio and more try to convince me, that they were only pushing for Democracy’Well it is just as they say ”NO ONE TELLS MORE LIES THAN A POLITICIAN ”or was Gaddafi nearer the Point when he spoke of the” Rats being here”
There they are squabbling over the number of Sorties or Murders they had done. Then they had that meeting in Paris, and sat down to a big Meal and Booze, while they smirked away at each other, while Human Beings were living in Misery without the Basics to live on and Dying and being Maimed.
Libya is in a mess and it will take a long Time to sort it out because of the various Sects.
As far as the Democratic Crap that’s been advised
goes,that will never Work so the only solution is to have a Dictator that is Elected, and of course can be removed at the end of their Term. It was used in Hitler’s Germany in the Thirties with some success and spoiled of course by the War that was released, and the Misery and Death it caused to nearly all the Nations on Earth.
This Answer to the Depression and Crimes in the First World War should be tried in Libya as there surely was Crimes committed there, and not only by…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
There is no doubt about it now,Napoleon is back so watch out Mr Cameron as you have cut our Defences which will leave us a Begging Bowl whenever we Deal with this International Gangster and War Monger. Did every one see that magnificent Man of War, the Aircraft carrier with it’s flying Cargo of Hell aboard, while you Mr Cameron quite rightly, gave up ours,but not like the Modern Napoleon who realises that they just like us and the U.S.A. are the most hated Countries on our Creators Earth.
Although I never liked Mrs Thatcher at any Time I will say this, she was right when she said it will keep the Peace for us,so be Warned David that it is all very well being one of the International Gangsters but you must protect this country because we the People did not kick start any of the Wars you and your side kicks (Labour)involved us in without even a say
Like or Dislike:
0
0
One other thing David, Napoleon Taxed the rich and kept his Aircraft Carrier. You gave ours up and left us with a Begging Bowl.
I AM 100% against Wars and the Selling of Arms abroad, but their is other Generations to come who must be protected, because of the War Mongers of the Past, your self included, who have allowed the International Money Lenders to start and stop Wars at their Will and make Profits at the expense of the Maimed and Dead. The Current War as well.
Like or Dislike:
0
0